Outrage at the Cinema

The students have humbled me into writing more posts. I regularly post a column to the blog “Mama, PhD” for Inside Higher Ed. But I SHOULD also be posting here! Let me cover my past few weeks in cinema, which, it seems, have dealt primarily with outrage at the world.

Films I’ve seen lately that remind me of “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore!”:

American Radical: the Trials of Norman Finkelstein
The Baader-Meinhof Complex
Capitalism: A Love Story
Bright Star (which does not quite count in this ‘outrage’ category, but Fannie Brawne was pretty upset that she couldn’t marry John Keats..)

American Radical:
In my time away from my kids as a filmmaker and media studies professor in Chicago, I have a lot of my evenings free to see the latest films, which are vital to refresh me, inspire me, keep me thinking…. Last week (Sept. 13th) I watched the premiere of “American Radical: the Trials of Norman Finkelstein” at Chicago’s Underground Film Festival. I went last Sunday on opening night when the film directors, David Ridgen and Nicolas Rossier, were supposed to appear, but did not. As festival director Bryan Wendorf explained, the next Monday was when Rossier’s daughter was attending her first day of school, so the audience certainly could not expect him to miss that event, and the directors would return to Chicago later in the week to make up for their absence.

“American Radical” documents the story of former DePaul University professor of Political Science, Norman Finkelstein — his family history, his research on the ‘Holocaust Industry’, his continued critiques of Israel’s actions against the Palestinian people, his conflicts with Harvard’s Alan Dershowitz, and finally the denial of Finkelstein’s application for tenure at DePaul and the protest that followed. (See IHE’s stories.)

The most powerful part of the film for me was the portrayal of Finkelstein’s relationship with his mother, Mary, now deceased and a survivor of the Majdanek concentration camp and the Warsaw ghetto. (His father survived Auschwitz’s death march.) FInkelstein states in the film how much his mother influenced him—her courage, her determination, her refusal to accept any further loss of human life after her experience in the camps. This determination, Finkelstein acknowledges, drives him to put himself literally on the front lines defending the Palestinian people, and, as his mother also worried, “destroying himself” in other ways. The film suggests that Finkelstein’s absorption with his mother’s values is both responsible for his courageous research and also for his inability to negotiate on certain issues when, perhaps, he should…— e.g. accusations about Dershowitz.

“American Radical” is a well-done, intimate documentary that covers Finkelstein’s personal biography, his global, experiential research, and the character flaw that led, in part, to his tenure downfall (and his own subtle acknowledgement of this flaw). The directors of the film objectively portray a story that is loaded with the ideological landmines of the Israeli/Palestinian story, including the legal vulnerabilities of the academic tenure process and how it can be affected by world politics.

Several of Finkelstein’s former students and organizers of the DePaul protest over his tenure denial were at the screening, and it was obvious that their disillusionment and experience with a high profile academic and political case had changed their lives. The students’ interpersonal relations with Finkelstein — a popular teacher and advisor at DePaul — were clearly powerful moments that would guide these students’ life decisions in the near future, as much as Finkelstein’s mother guided and inspired his own research.

“The Baader-Meinhof Complex”

I would wager a bet that most US students have never heard of the Red Army faction. Why? RAF terrorism is a little too direct for Americans. Of course, the U.S. now has 9/11 and the Oklahoma City bombing, as well as assassinations of doctors like George Tiller, but we seem to contextualize these events as unrelated to US, because they are committed by outsiders, ‘crazies’, non-WASPs–folks who are different from ‘mainstream’ Americans.

Well, it’s just this kind of outrage at the capitalist west and our military industrial complex that shows up in the “Baader-Meinhof Complex.” The powerful part of the film for me is how it chronicles the journey of Ulrike Meinhof from a recognized journalist of a left wing magazine and divorced mom into an armed terrorist who orchestrates murders of politicians (and former Nazi SS) and plans to give her kids up for adoption in Palestine. Meinhof’s role with the Red Army faction is indicative of what happened to a number of radicals in the 60s and 70s surrounding the Vietnam war. They were seriously outraged and took militant action, in some cases terrorist action.

What the film leaves out that I discovered online is that Meinhof had a brain injury at a young age from a tumor being removed. Unbeknownst to her family, doctors removed her brain after she died in prison and studied it for close to two decades. One doctor concluded that the trauma from this brain injury probably resulted in her psychological transformation. Meinhof’s daughter finally recovered the brain and buried it with the rest of her mother, after she died in prison. I’m not sure how this info would have changed the film. except to explain Meinhof’s outrage and character transformation better. However, the other RAS members did not suffer brain injuries and Meinhof was pretty radical before her brain injury…

The Baader-Meinhof Complex” is harsh and violent and depicts an era of youthful political rage that turned destructive. I think we should study 20th and 21st century terrorist history more in the U.S.. If only to figure out how to address this youthful rage.

Here’s Meinhof’s most recognized quote:
Protest is when I say this does not please me.
Resistance is when I ensure what does not please me occurs no more.

“Capitalism: A Love Story”
I just saw this new Michael Moore film a few nights ago in Chicago. It’s getting ambivalent reviews, but most critics applaud Moore’s enthusiasm while slapping him for his same old performative strategies (e.g. wrapping a ‘crime scene’ ribbon around parts of Wall Street).

What I found most effective about the film was that the night I went, there were also workers from Republic Windows and Doors–the Chicago company where workers took over the building in a sit-in last December after being told that their jobs were ending in 3 days. The sit-in resulted in a financial victory for the workers–close to $2 million in severance pay for their lost wages. Proceeds from the $20 movie tickets also went to workers and their families.

The other story in “Capitalism” that stood out for me was the airline pilot–Sullenberger–the one who did that heroic landing in the Hudson river. Moore includes footage of Capt. ‘Sully’ testifying before an empty Congress about the low wages regional pilots receive–so low ($20-40K) that some of them have to take a second job. Then I noticed that the NY Times this week carried another heroic story about Sullenberger reflying the path over the Hudson, but did not even mention his appearance in “Capitalism” nor the issue of underpaid pilots that he has also taken on in his union work…

Last film–Jane Campion’s “Bright Star” A lovely ode to poetry, romance, and stifled feminine desire and income. If you like Keats or sewing, you should see it. Actually, if you just want to support talented female directors, you should buy a ticket. Hollywood money did not fund this film–UK, Pathe, Australia did…